sophos_list_mobile_operating_systems

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist. The description discloses filtering capabilities but omits behavioral traits like pagination (page, page_size), rate limits, or data freshness. It implies a read operation but does not explicitly state safety or side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, front-loaded with the main action, and contains no redundant information. Every word contributes to understanding.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, the description is adequate for a list operation. It covers the core functionality and filters. Could mention pagination (page, page_size) but not essential. Overall complete for its complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the description adds little beyond the schema. It mentions 'filtering by platform or version prefix' but does not elaborate on format or behavior. Baseline 3 is appropriate as the schema already provides parameter descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool lists mobile operating systems from Sophos Mobile, with optional filtering. It uses a specific verb ('list') and resource ('mobile operating systems'). Among siblings like 'sophos_get_mobile_operating_system', it distinguishes itself as a list operation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description does not provide explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., sophos_get_mobile_operating_system for a single OS). Usage is implied but not clarified with when-not or alternative tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.