sophos_create_web_control_local_site

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate a write operation (readOnlyHint=false) and non-destructive (destructiveHint=false). The description adds that it creates an override to allow/block a URL/domain, but does not disclose key behaviors like whether changes take effect immediately or require policy deployment. It provides moderate additional context beyond annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences long, front-loaded with the action, and contains no unnecessary words. Every sentence adds value without redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 4 parameters, no output schema, and annotations that are not highly informative, the description is incomplete. It lacks explanation of how the allow/block action is determined (e.g., is it based on category?) and does not mention return behavior or success indicators. It covers the basics but has notable gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so each parameter has a description. The description adds little extra meaning beyond the schema; it repeats that categoryId is an integer from the categories list. According to the guidelines, baseline is 3 for high coverage, and the description does not significantly enhance parameter understanding.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool creates a Web Control local site override to allow or block a specific URL/domain. It uses a specific verb (Create) and resource (Web Control local site override), which distinguishes it from sibling tools like sophos_update_web_control_local_site and sophos_list_web_control_local_sites.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies that this tool is used when you need to add a new local site override, but it does not explicitly state when to use it versus alternatives such as updating or listing. It mentions categoryId is from the categories list, hinting at a prerequisite, but lacks clear when-to-use and when-not-to-use guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.