sophos_create_tenant

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate write operation (readOnlyHint=false) and non-destructive (destructiveHint=false). The description adds 'Create' which matches. No contradictions, but it does not elaborate on side effects or auth needs beyond the hints.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence conveying core action and requirements. No superfluous words; efficient but could be slightly more structured with bullet points or additional context.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 7 parameters, 6 required, and no output schema, the description is minimal. It doesn't explain success behavior, prerequisites (e.g., partner account), or return value. Sibling tools suggest many other creation endpoints, but this description lacks sufficient detail for complete understanding.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% with clear descriptions for each parameter (e.g., enums, formats). The description lists some parameters but adds no new semantic detail beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states 'Create a new tenant under this Sophos Central Partner account', specifying the verb (create) and resource (tenant). This distinguishes it from listing, getting, or updating tenants among siblings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Description lists required fields ('Requires tenant name, data geography, billing type, and primary contact details'), implying use for provisioning new tenants. However, it does not provide explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance compared to alternatives like sophos_create_tenant_admin.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.