sophos_get_mobile_action

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false, so the description need not repeat safety info. However, the description adds no additional behavioral context (e.g., what details are returned, pagination, error handling, or rate limits). It merely restates the basic function.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, fully front-loaded, no wasted words. Efficiently conveys core functionality.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Simple tool with 2 params and no output schema. Description covers purpose but omits output format or behavioral details that would help an agent use the returned data. With no output schema and many sibling tools, more context (e.g., 'returns status, device info') would improve completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% (both action_id and tenant_id described as UUIDs). Description adds no extra meaning beyond 'by its ID' – does not specify which parameter is the ID or the role of tenant_id. Baseline 3 is appropriate since schema already explains parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description states 'Get details for a specific MDM action by its ID' – clear verb (Get), resource (details for MDM action), and identification method (by ID). Distinguishes from sibling tools like sophos_mobile_action_sync which perform actions rather than retrieve details.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives (e.g., when to use sophos_get_mobile_device vs this tool). No prerequisites or contextual hints provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.