sophos_update_tls_excluded_websites

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint: false and destructiveHint: false. The description adds the behavior of handling both add and remove in a single call but provides no further behavioral context such as idempotency, rate limits, or auth requirements.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences, front-loaded with the action, and contains no unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

While the description explains the operation and parameters, it lacks details on response format, error conditions, and whether changes are incremental or replace the list. Given no output schema and a mutation operation, more completeness would be beneficial.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with descriptions for all parameters. The description reinforces the JSON array format and the ability to use both add and remove, which adds marginal value over the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb (add/remove) and resource (websites from TLS decryption exclusions) and distinguishes from sibling tools like sophos_list_tls_excluded_websites by specifying 'update in a single call'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives context by mentioning 'single call' and the ability to pass arrays for add and/or remove, but does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives, though no direct alternative exists for combined add/remove.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.