sophos_create_admin

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full burden. It discloses that an invitation email will be sent, which is an important behavioral trait. However, it does not mention prerequisites, error conditions, or the scope of permissions needed. Still, the email behavior adds significant transparency beyond the schema.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences: the first states the action and scope, the second adds the key side effect (invitation email). No fluff or repetition; every sentence earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers the main action and side effect. Given no output schema, it does not explain the response format (e.g., admin ID). However, for a straightforward creation tool with fully described parameters, it provides enough context for an AI agent to use it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, with each parameter already well-described (e.g., email's format and purpose, role_id referencing list_roles). The description adds no additional parameter semantics beyond the schema, so a baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it creates a partner-level administrator and that an invitation email will be sent. It uses a specific verb (Create) and resource (partner-level administrator), distinguishing it from sibling tools like sophos_create_tenant_admin that create tenant-level admins.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies the tool should be used to create a partner-level admin, but it does not explicitly state when to use it compared to alternatives such as sophos_create_tenant_admin or sophos_invite_tenant_admin. The schema hints at using sophos_list_roles for the role_id, but no direct usage guidance is provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.