sophos_get_licenses

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description is the sole source for behavioral info. It lists returned fields (license type, quantity, dates, usage) but omits any mention of authentication requirements, rate limits, or error states. For a read operation, this is adequate but not exceptional.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences: first states the core purpose, second lists return fields. Front-loaded, no redundancy, every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (one required param, no output schema, no nesting), the description sufficiently covers purpose and return data. It could be improved by mentioning that it returns an array or that all licenses are returned as a list, but it's largely complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The only parameter, tenant_id, is fully described in the schema (100% coverage). The description adds minimal value beyond the schema, merely confirming that the tenant's licenses are fetched. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Get' and the resource 'all product licenses', explicitly differentiating from sibling tools like sophos_get_firewall_licenses by specifying 'product licenses' and noting the scope (current usage, license type, dates, etc.).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies when to use (to retrieve product licenses) but does not explicitly contrast with alternatives like sophos_get_firewall_licenses or provide when-not-to-use guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.