sophos_get_endpoint

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It indicates a read operation ('Get detailed information') and lists categories of data returned, but does not disclose behavioral traits such as authentication requirements, rate limits, or potential side effects. The description is adequate but not exhaustive.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that is front-loaded with the purpose and provides key details without excess. Every word is necessary and contributes to clarity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a retrieval tool with 4 parameters and no output schema, the description covers the input context (endpoint ID) and the kind of data returned. It could be improved by briefly noting the response format (e.g., JSON object) but is largely sufficient.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% description coverage for all 4 parameters, so the description does not need to add much. The description mentions 'by its ID' which aligns with the required endpoint_id, but does not elaborate on optional parameters (view, fields). This is acceptable given the schema's completeness.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb ('Get'), the resource ('detailed information about a specific endpoint'), and the scope ('by its ID'), listing specific details (health, OS, network, assigned products, isolation status). This effectively distinguishes it from sibling tools like sophos_list_endpoints and sophos_get_endpoint_group.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies the tool is used when you have an endpoint ID, but it does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., sophos_list_endpoints for listing all endpoints, or sophos_get_endpoint_group for group-level info). No usage exclusions or context are provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.