sophos_delete_partner_admin_role_assignment

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, and the description fails to disclose any behavioral traits such as idempotency, error handling, side effects, or permissions required. The description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure but provides none.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with no wasted words. For a simple delete operation, this is efficient. However, it lacks structural elements that could improve readability.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the low complexity of the tool, the description does not explain return values, error conditions, or idempotency. While no output schema exists, the description should at least hint at expected outcomes (e.g., success message). It is incomplete for an agent to confidently invoke.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema provides clear descriptions for both parameters (admin_id and assignment_id). With 100% schema coverage, the description adds no additional meaning beyond what is already in the schema. Baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (Remove) and resource (role assignment from a partner admin). It is specific and aligns with the tool's name, but lacks explicit differentiation from sibling tools like sophos_delete_role_assignment, which could be used for non-partner admins.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., sophos_delete_role_assignment, sophos_delete_tenant_role_assignment). There is no mention of prerequisites or context for when this tool is appropriate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.