sophos_delete_blocked_item

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description lacks behavioral details beyond the action itself. It does not clarify whether the removal is reversible, if it requires specific user roles, or if it affects immediate blocking. The term 'globally' is ambiguous given the required 'tenant_id' parameter.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise with a single sentence. While it lacks depth, it avoids redundancy. It earns a 4 because it is front-loaded and efficient, but slightly too minimal for full utility.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no annotations and no output schema, the description is insufficient. It omits critical context such as whether this is a destructive action (though implied), what happens to associated data, and why a tenant_id is needed for a 'globally blocked item'. More detail is required for safe and correct usage.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already provides clear descriptions for both parameters (tenant_id and blocked_item_id). The description adds no additional semantic value beyond what the schema offers, so a baseline score of 3 is appropriate for 100% schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Remove') and the resource ('globally blocked item'), with the parenthetical '(unblock it)' reinforcing the purpose. This is unambiguous and distinguishes it from sibling tools like 'sophos_create_blocked_item' and 'sophos_list_blocked_items'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., 'sophos_unblock_addresses_bulk' for bulk unblocking). There is no mention of prerequisites, permissions, or context for appropriate use.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.