Skip to main content
Glama
fruggr

Zendesk MCP Server by Fruggr

List Article Translations

list_article_translations
Read-onlyIdempotent

Retrieve metadata for all translations of a Zendesk Help Center article to identify available locales, titles, draft status, and last update times.

Instructions

List all available translations for an article (metadata only, no body: locale, title, draft, updated_at). Use get_article with locale for full translated content.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
article_idYesArticle ID — the numeric id of the Help Center article. Obtain it from list_articles or search_articles.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv2.24.0
    • changedInput schema / $schema
      Previous value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"New value: +"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"
  2. Changed1 schema field changedv2.6.0
    • changedInput schema / properties / article_id / description
      Previous value: -"Article ID"New value: +"Article ID — the numeric id of the Help Center article. Obtain it from list_articles or search_articles."
  3. Changed1 schema field changedv2.3.1
    • addedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Added value: +false
  4. First observedv1.7.0

TDQS

A4.3/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint and non-destructive, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds real behavioral value by disclosing that only metadata is returned and enumerating which fields, which prevents an agent from expecting body content.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences, zero waste, with the payload constraint front-loaded before the routing advice. Every clause earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description compensates by naming the returned fields, and the single parameter is fully documented in the schema. Nothing needed to call this tool correctly is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There is one parameter and schema description coverage is 100% — the schema already explains article_id and where to obtain it. The description mentions 'locale' only as an argument to the sibling tool, adding nothing about this tool's own parameter, so baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (list) and resource (translations for an article) and immediately scopes the payload: metadata only, no body, with the exact fields (locale, title, draft, updated_at). An agent can distinguish this from get_article or create_article_translation without opening a schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It names the alternative (get_article with locale) and the condition that selects it (full translated content). The 'metadata only, no body' framing also implicitly states when not to use this tool, though there is no explicit exclusion or prerequisite beyond that.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.