Get Zendesk Organization
get_organizationRetrieve a Zendesk organization's details using its unique ID.
Instructions
Retrieve an organization by ID.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| organization_id | Yes | Organization ID |
get_organizationRetrieve a Zendesk organization's details using its unique ID.
Retrieve an organization by ID.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| organization_id | Yes | Organization ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already provide readOnlyHint=true, destructiveHint=false, idempotentHint=true. The description adds no further behavioral traits (e.g., error handling, auth needs). It is consistent but does not enrich.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no extraneous words, efficiently conveying the tool's purpose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple retrieval tool with rich annotations and no output schema, the description is sufficient. It lacks details on return format but is adequate given the low complexity.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with a clear description for organization_id. The description adds no additional meaning beyond what the input schema already provides.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Retrieve' and the resource 'organization by ID', making the purpose specific and distinct from siblings like list_organizations or get_user.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage when you have an organization ID, but it lacks explicit guidance on when to use versus alternatives like list_organizations or search. No exclusions or context provided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/fruggr/zendesk-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server