Skip to main content
Glama
fruggr

Zendesk MCP Server by Fruggr

Archive Help Center Article

archive_article
DestructiveIdempotent

Archive a Help Center article to remove it from public view while keeping it restorable via the Guide admin UI.

Instructions

Archive (soft-delete) a Help Center article: it is removed from the Help Center but can be restored from the Guide admin UI. Returns a confirmation message; the article and all its translations become invisible to end users. This is the only removal the Zendesk API offers — permanent deletion is not available via the API (do it from the Guide admin UI). To only hide an article temporarily while keeping it in the knowledge base, use update_article with draft: true (unpublish) instead. Guarded by a required confirm flag.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
confirmYesExplicit safety guard: must be set to true to archive the article. Any other value refuses the operation without calling Zendesk.
article_idYesArticle ID — the numeric id of the Help Center article. Obtain it from list_articles or search_articles.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv2.24.0
    • changedInput schema / $schema
      Previous value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"New value: +"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"
  2. Addedv2.8.0

TDQS

A4.6/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare destructiveHint=true and idempotentHint=true, but the description adds substantial context beyond them: it is a soft-delete that is restorable from the Guide admin UI, the article and all translations become invisible to end users, and it returns a confirmation message. The statement that permanent deletion is unavailable via the API is a critical behavioral disclosure.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The destructive semantics are front-loaded in the first clause and each sentence carries useful information. There is mild redundancy with 'Guide admin UI' appearing in two separate sentences, but overall it is efficient and well-ordered.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a destructive mutation with no output schema, the description covers the safety profile, restore path, end-user impact, and return value. An agent has everything needed to call it correctly and safely.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so both parameters are fully documented in the schema itself, including the confirm safety guard. The description only echoes the guard ('Guarded by a required confirm flag') without adding syntax or format detail beyond what the schema provides, so the baseline of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Archive (soft-delete) a Help Center article') and immediately clarifies the semantics of the operation. It distinguishes itself from the sibling update_article by naming it explicitly as the non-destructive alternative.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly tells the agent when to use this tool versus alternatives: it is the only removal the API offers, permanent deletion is not available, and update_article with draft: true should be used to hide temporarily. This covers when-to-use, when-not, and named alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.