edubase_delete_organization
Remove an organization from the EduBase platform by providing its identification string.
Instructions
Remove organization.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| organization | Yes | organization identification string |
Remove an organization from the EduBase platform by providing its identification string.
Remove organization.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| organization | Yes | organization identification string |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already indicate destructiveHint=true and idempotentHint=true. The description adds no further behavioral context beyond 'Remove', failing to disclose consequences like cascading deletion of associated data or permission requirements.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single short phrase, 'Remove organization.' While concise, it sacrifices substance and qualifies as under-specification rather than effective conciseness. It could benefit from a brief note on the scope of deletion.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's simplicity (one parameter, no output schema), the description fails to mention the permanence of the action, potential side effects, or expected return value. The agent lacks sufficient information for confident invocation.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% for the single parameter, which is already described as 'organization identification string'. The description does not add any additional meaning or context beyond what the schema provides, so baseline 3 applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Remove organization' clearly states the action and resource, but does not differentiate from sibling tools like edubase_delete_organization_members or edubase_delete_organization_permission, which also target the organization entity.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives, no prerequisites, and no context about the effect of deleting an organization. The agent is left without any usage recommendations.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/EduBase/MCP'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server