Skip to main content
Glama

edubase_get_exam_permission

Read-onlyIdempotent

Verify a user's permission level on a specific exam, including view, report, control, modify, grant, or admin access.

Instructions

Check if a user has permission on an exam.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
examYesexam identification string
userYesuser identification string
permissionYespermission level (view / report / control / modify / grant / admin)

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
userYesthe user identification string
contentYes
statusYes
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false. The description simply restates the title and adds no behavioral context such as return value behavior or access implications beyond what the annotations convey.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single, concise sentence of 7 words effectively communicates the tool's purpose with no extraneous information. Every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description is minimal but sufficient given the presence of an output schema that documents return values. It covers the core function without missing critical aspects for a permission-checking tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so each parameter has a description. The tool description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, meeting the baseline for high schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Check if a user has permission on an exam' clearly states the action (check), resource (exam), and subject (user). It is specific but does not distinguish from sibling get_*_permission tools like edubase_get_course_permission.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus other permission-checking siblings (e.g., edubase_get_course_permission). The context signals list sibling tools but the description offers no usage advice.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/EduBase/MCP'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server