edubase_post_video_transfer

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations indicate non-read-only, non-destructive, non-idempotent, and open-world hint, but the description adds no behavioral context beyond what annotations provide. It does not explain side effects (e.g., whether the original owner retains the video) or required permissions, leaving a significant transparency gap for a mutation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise (two words) and front-loaded. While it sacrifices necessary substance, it avoids any waste. A slightly longer sentence could provide better guidance without harming conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simplicity (2 params, all required, output schema exists) and the presence of sibling transfer tools, the description is too minimal. It lacks clarification on the transfer's semantics (ownership vs. permission) and any prerequisites. While output schema exists, the description should still provide enough context for an AI to invoke the tool correctly without guessing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, with both 'user' and 'video' described as identification strings. The description adds no additional meaning to these parameters. Baseline 3 is appropriate since the schema already sufficiently documents them.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Transfer video to user' is clear in its verb and resource but fails to differentiate from sibling transfer tools (e.g., edubase_post_exam_transfer, edubase_post_course_transfer). It does not specify what 'transfer' means in this context, leaving ambiguity about whether it changes ownership, grants permissions, or moves the video.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool over alternative transfer tools or its prerequisites. There is no mention of context, limitations, or when it should be avoided, making it hard for an AI agent to select correctly among many similarly named siblings.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.