EduBase MCP Server

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare destructiveHint=true and idempotentHint=true. The description confirms the destructive nature with 'Remove' but adds no further behavioral context such as error handling when permissions don't exist, side effects on existing user sessions, or cascade behaviors.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, front-loaded with the action verb, zero redundant words. Every element serves a purpose in defining scope (SCORM) and operation (permission removal).

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the presence of output schema, comprehensive annotations (destructive, idempotent hints), and complete parameter documentation, the description provides sufficient context for a permission deletion tool. Minor gap: does not mention idempotency explicitly or prerequisite checks (e.g., permission must exist), though annotations partially cover this.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 100% schema description coverage ('SCORM identification string', 'user identification string', enumerated permission levels), the schema fully documents parameters. The description adds no parameter-specific semantics, warranting the baseline score for well-documented schemas.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('Remove') with clear resource ('user permission') and context ('SCORM learning material'). It effectively distinguishes from siblings like edubase_delete_scorm_tag (deletes tags, not permissions) and edubase_delete_course_permission (different resource type).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description states what the tool does but provides no explicit guidance on when to use it versus alternatives like edubase_post_scorm_permission (to grant) or edubase_get_scorm_permission (to verify). Usage must be inferred from the verb 'Remove' and the sibling tool names.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.