Skip to main content
Glama

edubase_post_organization_permission

Assign a permission level (view, report, control, modify, grant, or admin) to a user for a specific organization.

Instructions

Create new permission for a user on an organization.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
organizationYesorganization identification string
userYesuser identification string
permissionYespermission level (view / report / control / modify / grant / admin)

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
userYesthe user identification string
contentYes
successYesoperation was successful
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations indicate mutation but the description offers no extra behavioral details beyond 'create'. It does not mention error handling, idempotency, or side effects (e.g., whether duplicate permissions cause errors or overwrites). No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, no unnecessary words. Could be slightly more informative without sacrificing conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers the basic purpose but omits details like permission level effects or prerequisites. Since an output schema exists, return values are less critical, but additional context would improve completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and each parameter has a clear description. The tool description adds no additional meaning, so baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (create), the resource (permission), and the context (on an organization). It distinguishes this tool from sibling tools like edubase_delete_organization_permission and edubase_get_organization_permission by specifying the creation action.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor any prerequisites or conditions. With many sibling permission tools, the description fails to help an agent decide when this specific creation tool is appropriate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/EduBase/MCP'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server