EduBase MCP Server

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and idempotentHint=true. The description adds semantic context about the data model—specifically that quizzes contain questions and power exams—which helps the agent understand the resource relationships. However, it does not disclose additional behavioral traits like caching, performance characteristics, or 'not found' behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description consists of exactly two sentences with zero redundancy. The first sentence front-loads the action ('Get/check'), while the second provides essential domain context. Every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (single parameter, read operation) and the presence of an output schema, the description is sufficiently complete. It explains what a quiz set is and its relationships. A minor gap is the lack of distinction between singular retrieval versus the list endpoint (edubase_get_quizes).

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 100% schema description coverage ('Quiz identification string'), the schema adequately documents the single 'quiz' parameter. The description adds no specific parameter guidance, but given the high schema coverage, the baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses specific verbs ('Get/check') and identifies the resource ('Quiz set'). It adds valuable context that the quiz 'Containing questions and powering Exams,' which distinguishes it from siblings like edubase_get_quiz_questions. However, it fails to clarify that this retrieves a single quiz versus the list operation edubase_get_quizes.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like edubase_get_quizes (list) or edubase_get_quiz_questions. It does not mention prerequisites, error conditions, or explicit use cases beyond the generic 'Get/check'.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.