EduBase MCP Server

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare destructiveHint=true, readOnlyHint=false, and idempotentHint=true, covering the safety profile. The description adds value by clarifying the dual-scope capability ('and/or') indicating it handles both persistent files and temporary links, which is not explicit in the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence with no redundancy. It is appropriately front-loaded with the action verb and contains zero extraneous text.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the rich annotations (destructive, idempotent hints) and simple single-parameter schema, the description is minimally adequate. However, for a destructive operation, it could benefit from mentioning the relationship to 'edubase_post_filebin_upload' or clarifying whether deletion is permanent vs. recoverable.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 100% schema description coverage, the input parameter 'id' is fully documented in the schema itself ('external unique filebin identifier...'). The description adds no additional parameter semantics beyond what the schema provides, meeting the baseline expectation for high-coverage schemas.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Delete') and the specific resources affected ('uploaded file and/or temporary file upload link'), distinguishing it from sibling delete operations that target classes, exams, or users. However, it doesn't explicitly reference 'Filebin' (the domain system name), relying on the tool name to provide that context.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor does it mention prerequisites such as needing to obtain the 'id' from 'edubase_post_filebin_upload' or 'edubase_filebin'. It also doesn't warn about permanent deletion implications despite the destructive nature.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.