edubase_delete_filebin_upload

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already mark this as destructive (destructiveHint: true) and idempotent (idempotentHint: true). The description adds that it deletes 'an uploaded temporary file and/or its upload link', clarifying the dual scope and the temporary nature of the resource. This goes slightly beyond the annotation hints, providing useful context without contradicting them.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, tightly worded sentence that leads with the verb and object, states the identifier source, and avoids any filler. Every word contributes to the meaning.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple delete operation with one parameter and no output schema, the description covers what is deleted, how the target is identified, and the relationship to the upload endpoint. It does not explain error handling or permission requirements, but these are not essential for a straightforward destructive action given the annotations already indicate idempotency and destructiveness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% coverage; the single 'id' parameter is fully described as 'external unique filebin identifier of the uploaded file or temporary file upload link'. The description reiterates this source but does not add new parameter semantics, so the baseline of 3 applies since the schema carries the meaning.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (Delete), the resource (uploaded temporary file and/or its upload link), and the identifier source (the filebin identifier returned by edubase_post_filebin_upload). It distinguishes itself from sibling delete tools by explicitly referencing the filebin upload context, making its purpose unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description specifies that the tool operates on files identified by the return value of edubase_post_filebin_upload, which tells the agent when to use it (after an upload) and what prerequisite is needed. It does not explicitly contrast with alternatives, but the context of filebin upload/delete is clear enough to avoid confusion with other delete tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.