edubase_patch_organization
Update an organization's details using its unique identifier.
Instructions
Update organization.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| organization | Yes | organization identification string |
Update an organization's details using its unique identifier.
Update organization.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| organization | Yes | organization identification string |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description adds no behavioral context beyond what annotations already provide. It does not disclose partial update semantics or side effects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Though very short, the description is under-specified, failing to provide useful information. It sacrifices completeness for brevity.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a PATCH operation, the description lacks essential details about what fields can be updated and how success is indicated, leaving the agent underinformed.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
With 100% schema coverage, baseline is 3. The description does not enhance understanding of the 'organization' parameter beyond its schema description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Update organization' merely paraphrases the tool's name 'edubase_patch_organization', offering no additional specificity or differentiation from sibling patch tools.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like edubase_post_organization (create) or edubase_delete_organization (delete).
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/EduBase/MCP'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server