edubase_delete_class_permission

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate destructiveHint=true and idempotentHint=true, so the description adds minimal behavioral context beyond stating the removal action. It does not disclose whether a non-existent permission raises an error or succeeds silently, nor does it cover effects on dependent data. With annotations present, the description fails to provide additional behavioral insight.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, clear sentence of six words. It is appropriately concise and front-loaded with the action. It could be slightly expanded to improve completeness without becoming verbose, but it is not under-specified.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (three parameters, no nested objects, output schema present), the description covers the essential action. However, it lacks information about behavior when the permission does not exist or when the user is not part of the class, which would be helpful for robust agent use. Overall, it is mostly complete for straightforward use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, with each parameter having a clear description and an enum for 'permission'. The description does not add any meaning beyond the schema, so baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Remove a user permission from a class.' uses a specific verb ('remove') and clearly identifies the resource (user permission on a class). It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like 'edubase_delete_class_members' and 'edubase_post_class_permission' by specifying the action (remove vs add) and the target (permission vs membership).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention prerequisites, when not to use, or any context about required existing permissions. For a destructive action, this lack of usage direction leaves the agent underinformed.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.