Skip to main content
Glama

edubase_delete_class_permission

DestructiveIdempotent

Remove a specific permission (view, report, control, modify, grant, admin) from a user for a class in EduBase.

Instructions

Remove a user permission from a class.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
classYesclass identification string
userYesuser identification string
permissionYespermission level (view / report / control / modify / grant / admin)

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
userYesthe user identification string
contentYes
successYesoperation was successful
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate destructiveHint=true and idempotentHint=true. The description simply says 'remove', which is consistent but adds no additional behavioral context (e.g., what happens if permission doesn't exist, or authorization requirements).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, direct sentence without any fluff. It is appropriately sized and front-loaded with the core action.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simplicity of the operation and the presence of annotations (idempotentHint, destructiveHint) plus full schema coverage, the description is mostly complete. It lacks mention of return value behavior, but this is a delete operation where annotations suffice.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with parameter descriptions already present. The tool description does not add any meaning beyond the schema, so the baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Remove') and the resource ('a user permission from a class'). It distinguishes this tool from siblings like edubase_delete_class_members, which removes members, not permissions.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as using get_class_permission first to view current permissions, or prerequisites like requiring admin privileges. No exclusions or context are given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/EduBase/MCP'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server