edubase_post_scorm_permission

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Beyond stating the action 'Create new permission', no additional behavioral traits are disclosed. Annotations already indicate it is not read-only, not destructive, not idempotent. The description should clarify whether this permission is additive, whether it overwrites existing permissions, or what side effects (e.g., access grants) occur.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence that delivers the core purpose without extraneous words. However, it is so concise that it omits valuable context; still, it is well-structured and front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the presence of a full output schema and complete parameter descriptions, the description covers the basic purpose adequately. However, it lacks details on idempotency (annotations say false), side effects, and what the output represents. For a creation tool, mentioning these aspects would improve completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema coverage is 100% with clear descriptions for each parameter. The tool description adds no extra meaning beyond what the schema already provides. Since schema coverage is high, baseline is 3, and description does not elevate it.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('create'), resource ('SCORM learning material'), and target ('a user'). It distinguishes the tool from siblings by explicitly naming the SCORM resource, which helps differentiate from other post_*_permission tools. However, it is very brief and could be more precise about the permission level.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as when to use edubase_post_scorm_permission vs. edubase_delete_scorm_permission or other permission tools for different resources. There is no mention of prerequisites, when not to use, or typical scenarios.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.