EduBase MCP Server

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotations comprehensively cover the safety profile (readOnlyHint=true, destructiveHint=false, idempotentHint=true). The description adds no behavioral context beyond this, but does not contradict the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The three-word description is maximally concise and front-loaded. While efficient, it borders on under-specification; however, no words are wasted or redundant.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the low complexity (single parameter, simple read operation), presence of an output schema, and comprehensive annotations, the description is minimally adequate. However, it lacks contextual guidance regarding sibling differentiation that would help an agent select this over edubase_get_user.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 100% schema description coverage for the single 'user' parameter ('user identification string'), the structured documentation is complete. The description adds no parameter semantics but meets the baseline given the schema's completeness.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Get user's name' is tautological, essentially restating the tool name (edubase_get_user_name). It fails to distinguish this tool from the sibling edubase_get_user (which likely returns a full user object including the name) or clarify what specific name format is returned (display name, full name, etc.).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this specialized getter versus the broader edubase_get_user, nor does it mention when to prefer this over edubase_get_user_me for the current authenticated user. No prerequisites or permission requirements are stated.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.