edubase_post_organization

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description is too brief to add behavioral context beyond the annotations. While annotations indicate it is not read-only and not destructive, the description does not disclose any side effects, required permissions, or constraints, such as the domain needing special privileges (which is only in the parameter schema).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise (one sentence), which is good for conciseness but fails to provide useful information. It is front-loaded but sacrifices completeness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 6 parameters, an output schema, and many sibling tools, the description is insufficient. It does not mention what the output is, any post-creation behavior, or how the organization relates to other entities.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 100% schema description coverage, the input schema already explains all parameters. The tool description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, so the baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Create') and the resource ('organization'). This distinguishes it from sibling tools like get_organization and delete_organization. However, it lacks any additional context about what constitutes an organization in this domain.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives or any prerequisites. For example, it does not mention that creating an organization may require special privileges for the domain parameter, nor does it contrast with other creation tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.