edubase_delete_user
Delete a user account from the EduBase platform using the user's identification string.
Instructions
Delete user.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| user | Yes | user identification string |
Delete a user account from the EduBase platform using the user's identification string.
Delete user.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| user | Yes | user identification string |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description adds no behavioral details beyond the annotations. Annotations indicate destructiveHint=true and idempotentHint=true, but the description does not explain consequences, such as whether deletion is permanent or cascading.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely concise at two words, which is efficient but may sacrifice necessary context. It is not verbose, but could benefit from a brief sentence on usage or effects.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the large number of sibling delete tools and the lack of output schema, the description is incomplete. It does not explain prerequisites, side effects, or return values, leaving the agent underinformed.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with a single 'user' parameter described as 'user identification string'. The description does not add extra meaning, but the schema is self-sufficient, so baseline 3 applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Delete user' clearly identifies the action (delete) and resource (user). It distinguishes this tool from siblings like edubase_delete_exam or edubase_delete_class_members by specifying the user resource.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus other delete tools (e.g., edubase_delete_user_classes, edubase_delete_user_organizations). The agent has no context for appropriate usage.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/EduBase/MCP'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server