edubase_post_organization_webhook_trigger

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations declare readOnlyHint=false and destructiveHint=false, which align with the description's trigger action. The description adds the important behavioral detail about the trigger_event constraint, which is beyond what annotations provide. However, it does not elaborate on side effects, error conditions, or authorization needs, which are partially compensated by the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, front-loaded with the main action, followed by the critical constraint. No unnecessary words; efficient and clear.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool with three parameters and no output schema, the description covers the essential purpose and a key constraint. It omits mentioning that the webhook must already exist (potentially created by edubase_post_organization_webhook), but this is a minor gap. Overall, it is reasonably complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the input schema already documents all parameters. The description adds that data must be a valid JSON string (already in schema) and that payload is optional, but does not significantly enhance understanding beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Trigger an organizational webhook call') and specifies the key constraint ('Only triggers webhooks with trigger_event set to api!'). This distinguishes it from sibling webhook tools like edubase_post_organization_webhook (which likely creates a webhook) and edubase_patch_organization_webhook.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description indicates when the tool is applicable (only for webhooks with trigger_event=api) but does not explicitly contrast it with alternative tools for creating or modifying webhooks. The condition is helpful but lacks explicit 'use when' guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.