edubase_get_exam_autologin

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already supply readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds value by detailing the specific returned data (PIN, links, account behavior), which is useful context beyond the annotation hints. No contradiction exists.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, well-structured sentence that front-loads the purpose ('Get the automatic login configuration') and then lists the relevant components. Every clause contributes useful information without redundancy or filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is a simple read operation with one fully documented parameter, a rich output schema, and safety annotations. The description covers what the tool returns, and the output schema can define exact return structure. Nothing essential is missing for an agent to invoke it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The single parameter 'exam' is fully documented in the schema as 'exam identification string' (100% coverage). The description does not add further detail about the parameter, but with complete schema coverage, the baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('Get') and resource ('automatic login configuration of an exam'), and enumerates exactly what the configuration contains: enabled state, PIN code, login/results links, and account generation/registration behavior. This clearly distinguishes it from sibling mutation tools like post_exam_autologin and delete_exam_autologin.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No usage guidance is given. The description never says when to use this tool versus the post/delete autologin siblings, nor does it mention any prerequisites or when a GET is appropriate. The intended use is only implied by the verb 'Get' and the resource name.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.