Skip to main content
Glama

Convert Time Between Timezones

time.worldclock.convert
Read-onlyIdempotent

Convert date/time between IANA timezones, automatically adjusting for daylight saving time.

Instructions

Convert date/time from one timezone to another. DST-aware. 597 IANA timezones (TimeAPI.io)

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
from_timezoneYesSource IANA timezone (e.g. "America/New_York")
datetimeYesDate and time to convert in "YYYY-MM-DD HH:mm:ss" format (e.g. "2026-03-20 12:00:00")
to_timezoneYesTarget IANA timezone (e.g. "Asia/Tokyo")

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultNoTool response payload. Shape varies per tool — consult the tool description and inputSchema. May be an object, array, string, or number depending on the upstream provider response.
errorNoPresent only when the call failed. Includes error code, message, request_id, and any provider-specific extras.
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate read-only, idempotent, and non-destructive behavior. Description adds value by noting DST awareness and support for 597 IANA timezones, supplementing the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence conveying purpose, DST awareness, timezone count, and data source. Every word adds value; no redundant information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the presence of an output schema, the description adequately covers the tool's core function, DST behavior, and scope. Missing explicit mention of input format, but schema covers that.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema has 100% coverage with descriptions for each parameter. The tool description does not add further semantic detail beyond the schema, meeting baseline expectations.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the tool converts date/time between timezones, specifying verb and resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools like current and zones by its unique function.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like time.worldclock.current or time.worldclock.zones. Usage is implied by the name and purpose but lacks direct comparison.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/whiteknightonhorse/APIbase'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server