set_data_asset_properties

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Without annotations, the description carries the burden of behavioral disclosure. It reveals the tool performs 'one load + one save,' implying a two-step operation. However, it does not detail error handling, idempotency, prerequisites (e.g., asset must exist), or merging behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise: two sentences with no superfluous words. It front-loads the key purpose and efficiency benefit, making it easy for an AI agent to quickly grasp the tool's value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (two params, with output schema available separately) and the reference to the sibling for value format, the description covers the essential aspects. Minor gaps exist, such as not explaining that properties keys must be valid property names, but overall it is sufficiently complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It adds meaning by stating that the properties field uses the 'same value format as set_data_asset_property,' which clarifies the structure of the properties object. Asset_path is not elaborated, but the parameter name is self-explanatory.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states that the tool sets multiple properties in a single call, distinguishing it from the sibling set_data_asset_property which handles one property at a time. The verb 'set' and resource 'data asset properties' are specific, and the efficiency advantage is mentioned.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly says 'More efficient than calling set_data_asset_property in a loop,' indicating when to use this tool. It also notes the same value format as the sibling. However, it does not provide explicit when-not-to-use scenarios or alternatives beyond the sibling.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.