rename_niagara_scratch_pad_module

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Description only indicates 'rename' without discussing side effects, required permissions, or behavior on conflicts; no annotations to compensate.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single short sentence is concise but lacks necessary detail; every word earns its place but the sentence is too brief to be fully useful.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Output schema exists but description doesn't mention return value or error conditions; lacks context on prerequisites like system state or naming rules.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema has 0% parameter descriptions, and the description adds no meaning beyond parameter names; no elaboration on format, constraints, or relationship between parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states 'Rename a scratch pad module on a Niagara System' - specific verb+resource, distinguishes from sibling rename tools for assets and parameters.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance provided on when to use this tool vs alternatives like rename_niagara_script_parameter or rename_asset, nor any conditions for use.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.