Skip to main content
Glama
tresor4k

macalc

calculate_us_child_tax_credit

Calculate 2026 US Child Tax Credit: inputs AGI, number of children under 17, and filing status; outputs final credit after phase-out.

Instructions

Calculate US Child Tax Credit for 2026 with phase-out based on AGI. Returns: {agi, base_credit, credit_reduction, final_credit}. See list_bundles for related 'finance-us' calculators.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
children_under_17YesNumber of qualifying children under age 17
agiYesAdjusted Gross Income in USD
filing_statusNoFiling statussingle

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultNoComputed result. Object whose fields depend on the tool (e.g. {tax, marginal_rate, brackets} for tax tools, {volume_l, gallons} for volume tools).
formulaNoHuman-readable formula or method used (e.g. "I=P·r·t", "Magnus formula").
sourceNoAuthoritative source for the rule or formula (e.g. "Article 197 CGI", "NF DTU 21").
reference_urlNoLink to a calcul2 page documenting the calculation in detail.
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided; description adds return structure and phase-out detail but does not explicitly state read-only nature or side effects, leaving some behavioral gaps.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, succinct, front-loaded with purpose and result format; no unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Adequately covers purpose, return values, and points to related tools; sufficient for a straightforward calculator with full schema coverage.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%; description does not add any additional meaning to the parameters beyond what is already in the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states it calculates the US Child Tax Credit for 2026 with phase-out based on AGI, distinguishing it from other US tax calculators by specifying the year and mechanism.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Implied usage for child tax credit calculation; suggests exploring related calculators via list_bundles but no explicit when-not-to-use or alternative selection guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/tresor4k/macalc-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server