calculate_ring_size_convert

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must cover behavioral traits. It only states inputs and outputs but does not disclose safety, idempotency, or side effects. Missing details like whether it requires authentication or has rate limits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short (two sentences) but contains incorrect information. Conciseness is partially achieved at the cost of accuracy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite having an output schema, the description only states 'Returns equivalent size' without specifying format or units. It lacks details on edge cases or system mappings, leaving gaps for complex scenarios.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description mentions a third parameter 'to-system' which does not exist in the schema (only size and from_system are defined). This is a serious discrepancy, making the description misleading and unreliable.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool converts ring sizes between EU, US, UK, and Japan systems, specifying the verb and resource. It distinguishes itself from siblings by focusing on ring size conversion.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description suggests use for international jewelry shopping, providing context. However, it lacks explicit guidance on when not to use it or alternatives, and the reference to list_bundles is vague.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.