calculate_dog_walking_calories

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must convey behavioral traits. As a calculator, it is implicitly a read-only operation, but the description does not explicitly state that it does not modify data or have side effects. It mentions it returns calories, but insufficient detail for full transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is three sentences, front-loading the core purpose. It is efficient with no extraneous information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no annotations and 4 parameters, the description misses one parameter and does not detail the return format. Although an output schema exists, the incomplete parameter list makes it less complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It lists 'dog weight, walk duration, pace' but omits 'walker_weight_kg', which is a required parameter. This omission reduces clarity about what inputs are needed.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it computes calories burned by dog and human during a walk, and specifies 'Use for pet weight management.' This distinguishes it from sibling calculators like 'calculate_dog_age' or 'calculate_bmi'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description indicates using the tool for pet weight management, providing a clear context. It also suggests seeing 'list_bundles' for related calculators, implying alternatives. However, it does not explicitly state when not to use it or compare to siblings.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.