Skip to main content
Glama
tresor4k

macalc

calculate_ideal_weight

Estimate your ideal body weight using Lorentz and Devine formulas based on height and biological sex. Provides Lorentz, Devine, and average weight in kilograms for health assessments.

Instructions

Estimate ideal body weight using Lorentz and Devine formulas. Returns: {lorentz_kg, devine_kg, average_kg}. See list_bundles for related 'sante' calculators.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
height_cmYesHeight in centimeters
sexYesBiological sex

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultNoComputed result. Object whose fields depend on the tool (e.g. {tax, marginal_rate, brackets} for tax tools, {volume_l, gallons} for volume tools).
formulaNoHuman-readable formula or method used (e.g. "I=P·r·t", "Magnus formula").
sourceNoAuthoritative source for the rule or formula (e.g. "Article 197 CGI", "NF DTU 21").
reference_urlNoLink to a calcul2 page documenting the calculation in detail.
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It discloses the return format and formulas used, but lacks details on limitations, assumptions, or edge cases, which is adequate for a simple calculator.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two concise sentences with no unnecessary information, front-loading the purpose and returning value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simplicity of the tool and the presence of an output schema, the description sufficiently covers its functionality without missing critical details.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, and the description does not add extra meaning beyond the schema. It mentions formulas but does not elaborate on parameter interpretation, so it meets the baseline.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool estimates ideal body weight using Lorentz and Devine formulas, which is specific and distinguishes it from sibling tools that may estimate body weight with other methods.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The mention of 'See list_bundles for related sante calculators' is vague and does not provide clear usage context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/tresor4k/macalc-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server