Skip to main content
Glama
tresor4k

macalc

calculate_sunrise_sunset

Calculate approximate sunrise and sunset times using latitude and day of year. Returns sunrise and sunset in solar time and day length in hours.

Instructions

Approximate sunrise and sunset times based on latitude and day of year. Returns: {sunrise_solar_time, sunset_solar_time, day_length_hours}. See list_bundles for related 'astronomie-nature' calculators.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
latitudeYesLatitude in degrees
day_of_yearYesDay of year (1-365)

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultNoComputed result. Object whose fields depend on the tool (e.g. {tax, marginal_rate, brackets} for tax tools, {volume_l, gallons} for volume tools).
formulaNoHuman-readable formula or method used (e.g. "I=P·r·t", "Magnus formula").
sourceNoAuthoritative source for the rule or formula (e.g. "Article 197 CGI", "NF DTU 21").
reference_urlNoLink to a calcul2 page documenting the calculation in detail.
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full burden. It states the tool is 'approximate' and lists output fields, but does not disclose limitations, required permissions, or potential side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences: first states purpose, second lists output and references related tools. No unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple calculation tool with full schema and output schema, the description covers the key inputs and outputs, plus a reference to related calculators. Could mention assumptions or accuracy bounds.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with descriptions for both parameters. The description adds minimal extra meaning beyond restating 'latitude and day of year.' The baseline is 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it calculates approximate sunrise/sunset times based on latitude and day of year, and specifies the return fields. However, it does not differentiate from sibling tools like calculate_sunrise_approx or other astronomy calculators.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description only briefly mentions 'See list_bundles for related calculators' but does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor provides exclusions or prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/tresor4k/macalc-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server