calculate_seed_quantity

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, and the description does not disclose any behavioral traits such as read-only nature, permissions, or potential side effects. As a calculation tool, it is likely safe, but the description fails to affirm this, leaving ambiguity.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that front-loads the primary purpose, followed by a helpful pointer to related tools. Every word earns its place, with no redundancy or filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the presence of an output schema (as indicated by context signals) and a detailed input schema, the description is largely complete for a simple calculator. It could mention the unit of the result, but the output schema likely covers that, so this is a minor gap.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already provides complete descriptions for all 4 parameters (100% coverage), so the description adds little beyond listing them. It does not provide additional context or caveats that the schema lacks, meeting the baseline but not exceeding it.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool calculates the number of seeds needed based on surface area, spacing, and germination rate. It uses a specific verb (Calculate) and resource (number of seeds), distinguishing it from the many sibling calculators, especially with the reference to 'jardinage' calculators.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides a pointer to list_bundles for related calculators, implying it is part of a gardening set, but does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives or when not to use it. The guidance is minimal and indirect.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.