Skip to main content
Glama
tresor4k

macalc

calculate_sun_exposure

Calculate safe sun exposure using UV index and Fitzpatrick skin type. Obtain safe exposure times, SPF30-adjusted minutes, UV risk level, and personalized recommendations.

Instructions

Calculate safe sun exposure time based on UV index and Fitzpatrick skin type. Returns: {skin_description, safe_exposure_minutes, with_spf30_minutes, uv_risk_level, recommendations}. See list_bundles for related 'voyage' calculators.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
uv_indexYesUV index at destination (1–11+)
skin_typeYesFitzpatrick skin type: 1=very fair, 6=very dark

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultNoComputed result. Object whose fields depend on the tool (e.g. {tax, marginal_rate, brackets} for tax tools, {volume_l, gallons} for volume tools).
formulaNoHuman-readable formula or method used (e.g. "I=P·r·t", "Magnus formula").
sourceNoAuthoritative source for the rule or formula (e.g. "Article 197 CGI", "NF DTU 21").
reference_urlNoLink to a calcul2 page documenting the calculation in detail.
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description bears full burden. It discloses it's a calculation tool returning data, but does not elaborate on side effects, permissions, or edge cases. Adequate but not exceptional.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, front-loaded with key action and outputs. Cross-reference to list_bundles is efficient. No extraneous details.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Lists return fields explicitly, but does not mention error cases, range constraints beyond schema, or time units. Output schema not provided; description compensates well for a simple tool with two parameters.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema covers both parameters fully (100% coverage). Description mentions UV index and skin type but adds no new semantic value beyond schema definitions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states verb 'calculate', resource 'safe sun exposure time', and inputs (UV index, skin type). Also lists return fields, making purpose unambiguous. Distinct from siblings despite many similar 'calculate' tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Only a vague reference to list_bundles for related calculators; no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor any exclusions or prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/tresor4k/macalc-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server