gmail_get_filter
Retrieve a specific Gmail filter using its ID to manage email organization rules.
Instructions
Get a specific Gmail filter by ID
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| filterId | Yes | The filter ID |
Retrieve a specific Gmail filter using its ID to manage email organization rules.
Get a specific Gmail filter by ID
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| filterId | Yes | The filter ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, and the description does not disclose behavioral traits like error behavior, permissions, or data freshness. For a get operation, minimal but still lacks transparency.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely concise single sentence. Could be improved with structured formatting but is clear and to the point.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the low complexity, the description is incomplete: it does not specify the return value, error handling, or relation to other filter tools (list, create, delete).
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with the parameter described as 'The filter ID'. The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, so baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Clearly states the action (Get) and resource (specific Gmail filter by ID). Distinguishes from sibling tools like list_filters and create_filter.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as list_filters. No context about prerequisites or typical usage.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/salviz/google-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server