calendar_list_settings
List all user settings for Google Calendar to view or audit calendar configuration.
Instructions
List all Google Calendar user settings
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
List all user settings for Google Calendar to view or audit calendar configuration.
List all Google Calendar user settings
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided; the description only states 'list all', implying a read operation. It lacks details on permissions, response structure, or any side effects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, concise sentence with no superfluous information. It is front-loaded and efficient.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The tool is simple with no parameters or output schema. However, the description could mention that it returns all settings with keys/values, or note any behavior like pagination. It meets minimum viability but lacks completeness.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters are defined, so the schema fully describes the input. The description adds no additional parameter information, but a baseline of 4 is appropriate for zero-parameter tools.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states 'List all Google Calendar user settings' with a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from siblings like 'calendar_get_setting' which gets a single setting.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'calendar_get_setting' for individual settings. The description does not mention conditions or exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/salviz/google-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server