drive_get_app
Retrieve details of a specific installed Google Drive app by providing its app ID.
Instructions
Get a specific installed Drive app by ID
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| appId | Yes | The app ID |
Retrieve details of a specific installed Google Drive app by providing its app ID.
Get a specific installed Drive app by ID
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| appId | Yes | The app ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It only states the action and does not disclose any behavioral traits (e.g., read-only, auth requirements, error handling).
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no unnecessary words. Concise and direct.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description is minimally adequate. However, it lacks information about return values, errors, or permissions.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with one parameter 'appId' described. The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, so baseline score of 3 applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states verb 'Get', resource 'specific installed Drive app', and method 'by ID'. It distinguishes from sibling 'drive_list_apps' (list vs. get by ID).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Implied usage: when you need a specific app by ID. No explicit when-not or alternatives mentioned, but the purpose is clear for this simple tool.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/salviz/google-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server