Skip to main content
Glama
phillipboesger

Polarion MCP Server

getWorkRecord

Retrieve a specific work record from a work item in a Polarion project. Requires project ID, work item ID, and work record ID.

Instructions

Returns the specified instance.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
projectIdYesThe Project ID.
workItemIdYesThe Work Item ID.
workRecordIdYesThe Work Record ID.
fieldsNoFilter returned resource fields. See <a href="https://docs.sw.siemens.com/en-US/doc/230235217/PL20231017526942799.polarion_help_sc.xid2134849/xid2134871" target="_blank">REST API User Guide</a> for details.
includeNoInclude related entities. See <a href="https://docs.sw.siemens.com/en-US/doc/230235217/PL20231017526942799.polarion_help_sc.xid2134849/xid2134871" target="_blank">REST API User Guide</a> for details.
revisionNoThe revision ID.
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must disclose behavior. It only says 'returns the specified instance', implying a read operation but not explicitly stating read-only, required permissions, or side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness2/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise but underspecified. A single sentence does not adequately describe the tool's purpose or parameters.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema, 6 parameters including nested objects, and no explanation of what a work record is. The description is completely inadequate for the tool's complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with descriptions for all 6 parameters. The tool description adds no additional meaning beyond what the schema provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose3/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states it returns an instance, which aligns with the tool name. However, it does not specify what a work record is or differentiate it from siblings like getTestRecord or getWorkRecords.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. Among many get* siblings, there is no context for when getWorkRecord is appropriate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/phillipboesger/polarion-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server