Skip to main content
Glama
phillipboesger

Polarion MCP Server

getAvailableEnumOptionsForDocument

Get the available enum options for a field in a document. Specify project, space, document, and field to see valid values.

Instructions

Returns a list of available options for the requested field in the specified Document.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
projectIdYesThe Project ID.
spaceIdYesThe Space ID. (Use '_default' without quotes to address the default Space.)
documentNameYesThe Document name.
fieldIdYesThe Field ID.
page_sizeNoLimit the number of entities returned in a single response. See <a href="https://docs.sw.siemens.com/en-US/doc/230235217/PL20231017526942799.polarion_help_sc.xid2134849/xid2134871" target="_blank">REST API User Guide</a> for details.
page_numberNoSpecify the page number to be returned. Counting starts from 1. See <a href="https://docs.sw.siemens.com/en-US/doc/230235217/PL20231017526942799.polarion_help_sc.xid2134849/xid2134871" target="_blank">REST API User Guide</a> for details.
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full burden but fails to disclose behavioral traits: no mention of pagination (despite parameters), error conditions, or requirements like document existence. Only states read behavior implicitly.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence that is clear and efficient. No wasted words, easy to parse.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with 6 parameters (4 required) and no output schema, the description is too minimal. It does not explain return format, pagination, or what 'available options' means operationally. More context is needed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the schema already describes all parameters. The description adds no additional meaning beyond what is in the input schema. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'returns' and the resource 'list of available options for the requested field in the specified Document'. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like getAvailableEnumOptionsForDocumentType and getCurrentEnumerationOptionsForDocument.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as getCurrentEnumerationOptionsForDocument or getAvailableEnumOptionsForWorkItem. The description only states what it does without context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/phillipboesger/polarion-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server