deletePlans
Remove one or more plans from a project by specifying their IDs in the request body.
Instructions
Deletes a list of Plans.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| projectId | Yes | The Project ID. | |
| requestBody | Yes | The Plan(s) body. |
Remove one or more plans from a project by specifying their IDs in the request body.
Deletes a list of Plans.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| projectId | Yes | The Project ID. | |
| requestBody | Yes | The Plan(s) body. |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It only states 'deletes a list of Plans' without disclosing side effects, permissions required, or whether deletion is reversible. For a mutation tool, this is insufficient.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is very short (one sentence), which is concise but lacks substance. It does not front-load critical information or earn its place with added value.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's complexity (nested parameters, batch operation) and lack of output schema, the description is incomplete. It fails to explain the batch nature or list deletion semantics, which is needed for effective use.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, and the description adds no additional meaning beyond what the schema already provides. Baseline 3 is appropriate as the description does not compensate for missing parameter details.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'deletes' and the resource 'a list of Plans', but does not differentiate from the sibling 'deletePlan' (singular). A 5 would require explicit mention of batch deletion versus single deletion.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like deletePlan. There is no mention of prerequisites or context for batch deletion.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/phillipboesger/polarion-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server