Skip to main content
Glama
phillipboesger

Polarion MCP Server

deleteTestStepResultAttachment

Remove unwanted attachments from test step results in Polarion test runs by specifying project, test run, test case, iteration, step index, and attachment ID.

Instructions

Deletes the specified Test Step Result Attachment.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
projectIdYesThe Project ID.
testRunIdYesThe Test Run ID.
testCaseProjectIdYesThe Testcase Project ID.
testCaseIdYesThe Testcase ID.
iterationYesThe Iteration Number.
testStepIndexYesThe Test Step index.
attachmentIdYesThe Attachment ID.
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, and the description does not disclose any behavioral traits such as required permissions, irreversibility, cascading deletions, or error conditions. A delete operation demands more transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence with no unnecessary words. However, it could be slightly expanded to include key information without losing conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 7 required parameters and no output schema, the description is incomplete. It does not mention what happens on success (e.g., returns nothing, confirmation), nor does it provide context for the many parameters.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, with each parameter documented in the input schema. The description adds no additional context or meaning beyond the schema, so a baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Deletes' and the resource 'Test Step Result Attachment', which is specific and distinct from sibling tools like deleteWorkItemAttachment or deleteTestStepResultAttachments (plural).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. Among many sibling delete tools (e.g., deleteTestRunAttachment, deleteWorkItemAttachment), there is no differentiation or mention of prerequisites or conditions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/phillipboesger/polarion-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server