Skip to main content
Glama
phillipboesger

Polarion MCP Server

deleteTestRecordAttachment

Delete a test record attachment from a Polarion test run using project, test run, test case, iteration, and attachment IDs.

Instructions

Deletes the specified Test Record Attachment.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
projectIdYesThe Project ID.
testRunIdYesThe Test Run ID.
testCaseProjectIdYesThe Testcase Project ID.
testCaseIdYesThe Testcase ID.
iterationYesThe Iteration Number.
attachmentIdYesThe Attachment ID.
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must fully disclose behavior. It only states 'Deletes' which implies mutation, but does not mention reversibility, permissions, side effects, or required states. Lacks crucial behavioral context for a delete operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise at one sentence, which is efficient. However, the brevity sacrifices completeness. Still, it earns its place without fluff, so a 4 is reasonable.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, no annotations, and 6 required parameters, the description is incomplete. It fails to explain what a test record attachment is, the deletion's effect on related data, or any error conditions. Insufficient for an agent to use correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with individual parameter descriptions. The description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema. Baseline 3 is appropriate as the schema already documents parameters adequately.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (delete) and resource (specified Test Record Attachment). It differentiates from siblings like deleteTestRecordAttachments (plural) by indicating singular attachment. However, it does not specify the scope or what 'attachment' refers to in context.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as deleteTestRecordAttachments or deleteTestRunAttachment. There is no context about prerequisites or conditions under which deletion is appropriate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/phillipboesger/polarion-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server