Skip to main content
Glama
phillipboesger

Polarion MCP Server

getPage

Retrieve a specific page from a Polarion project by providing project ID, space ID, and page name. Optionally filter fields or include related entities.

Instructions

Returns the specified Page.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
projectIdYesThe Project ID.
spaceIdYesThe Space ID. (Use '_default' without quotes to address the default Space.)
pageNameYesThe Page name.
fieldsNoFilter returned resource fields. See <a href="https://docs.sw.siemens.com/en-US/doc/230235217/PL20231017526942799.polarion_help_sc.xid2134849/xid2134871" target="_blank">REST API User Guide</a> for details.
includeNoInclude related entities. See <a href="https://docs.sw.siemens.com/en-US/doc/230235217/PL20231017526942799.polarion_help_sc.xid2134849/xid2134871" target="_blank">REST API User Guide</a> for details.
revisionNoThe revision ID.
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided; description only says 'returns' implying read-only, but lacks detail on error handling, permissions, or side effects. Insufficient for a tool with 6 parameters.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence with no filler; concise but lacking substance. Could be improved with more detail without becoming verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Description fails to explain what a 'Page' is, how fields/include/revision affect results, or return value structure. With no output schema and complex inputs, completeness is severely lacking.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so parameters are already documented. Description adds no additional parameter semantics, meeting baseline.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose3/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description states it returns the specified Page, which is clear but fails to distinguish this tool from many sibling getters. It essentially restates the name with minimal context.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like getDocument, getPlan, etc. Missing usage context and exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/phillipboesger/polarion-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server