Skip to main content
Glama
fauguste

boondmanager-mcp-server

Compétences techniques d'une ressource

boond_resources_technical_data
Read-onlyIdempotent

Retrieve a resource's technical profile (skills, experiences, certifications, languages, CV) by ID. Use to load only this section without fetching the full record.

Instructions

Récupère le profil technique (compétences, expériences, formations, certifications, langues, CV) d'un(e) ressource, par son ID.

Quand : pour ne charger que cette section, sans le reste de la fiche. Plutôt que : boond_resources_get pour la fiche de base, ou boond_resources_search si l'ID est inconnu.

Returns : Profil technique de la ressource. Modifiable via boond_resources_technical_data_update. Lecture seule.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesIdentifiant unique de l'entité BoondManager (numérique)

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv2.12.2
    • removedInput schema / $schema
      Removed value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"
  2. Changed3 schema fields changedv2.7.0
    • changedInput schema / properties / id / description
      Previous value: -"Identifiant unique de l'entité BoondManager"New value: +"Identifiant unique de l'entité BoondManager (numérique)"
    • removedInput schema / properties / id / minLength
      Removed value: -1
    • addedInput schema / properties / id / pattern
      Added value: +"^\\d+$"
  3. First observedv2.1.0

TDQS

A4.3/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false. The description confirms 'Lecture seule' (redundant with annotations) and adds a useful pointer that the data is modifiable via boond_resources_technical_data_update. It does not disclose details like authentication requirements, response shape, or CV format, but the read-only behavior is well covered.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is compact, front-loads the purpose, and organizes guidance into clear 'Quand' and 'Plutôt que' sections. Every sentence adds value; no fluff.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a single-parameter read-only list/retrieval tool, the description covers what it returns, when to use it, what not to use instead, and how to modify the data. The annotations cover the read-only safety profile. Nothing an agent needs to decide or call correctly is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% – the only parameter 'id' is fully described as 'Identifiant unique de l'entité BoondManager (numérique)'. The description adds no extra semantics beyond confirming the resource is identified by ID. Baseline 3 is appropriate since the schema carries the meaning.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb ('Récupère'), a precise resource ('le profil technique ... d'une ressource'), and the exact contents (compétences, expériences, formations, certifications, langues, CV). It also distinguishes itself from boond_resources_get (basic record) and boond_resources_search (unknown ID), making the tool's scope unmistakable.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The 'Quand' (when) section gives a concrete use case: load only this section without the rest of the record. The 'Plutôt que' section explicitly names sibling tools and the conditions for choosing them (boond_resources_get for base record, boond_resources_search when the ID is unknown). This is excellent routing guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools