Skip to main content
Glama
fauguste

boondmanager-mcp-server

Détails d'une notification

boond_notifications_get
Read-onlyIdempotent

Retrieve the complete record for a specific notification by its numeric ID, including attributes and relations not shown in list summaries. Use after a search to get full details.

Instructions

Récupère la fiche complète d'un(e) notification par son ID numérique.

Quand : après un boond_notifications_search, pour obtenir les attributs qui n'apparaissent pas dans le résumé de liste. Plutôt que : boond_notifications_search si l'ID n'est pas connu (cet outil n'accepte pas de nom).

  • Un ID inconnu remonte l'erreur BoondManager telle quelle — l'ID doit venir de boond_notifications_search, jamais d'une supposition.

Returns : JSON de l'entité (attributs + relations) tel que renvoyé par l'API. Lecture seule.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesIdentifiant unique de l'entité BoondManager (numérique)

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv2.12.2
    • removedInput schema / $schema
      Removed value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"
  2. Changed3 schema fields changedv2.7.0
    • changedInput schema / properties / id / description
      Previous value: -"Identifiant unique de l'entité BoondManager"New value: +"Identifiant unique de l'entité BoondManager (numérique)"
    • removedInput schema / properties / id / minLength
      Removed value: -1
    • addedInput schema / properties / id / pattern
      Added value: +"^\\d+$"
  3. First observedv2.1.0

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already provide readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, and destructiveHint, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds meaningful behavioral context beyond annotations: an unknown ID produces the raw BoondManager error, the ID must come from boond_notifications_search, and the return value is the full entity JSON with attributes and relations. This is valuable operational transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise and well structured: a one-line purpose, then explicit 'Quand', 'Plutôt que', and error-warning sections, followed by a return format note. Every sentence earns its place and the most important information is front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple single-parameter read tool, the description is complete. It explains when to use it, how it relates to its sibling, what happens on an unknown ID, what the output looks like, and that the operation is read-only. Nothing essential is missing for an agent to invoke it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% for the single id parameter, so the schema already documents the numeric ID. The description reinforces that the ID must be numeric and must come from boond_notifications_search, but it does not add much beyond what the schema and the usage guidance already imply.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with 'Récupère la fiche complète d'un(e) notification par son ID numérique', which is a specific verb-plus-resource statement. It clearly distinguishes this tool from boond_notifications_search by stating that it fetches the full notification record for a known numeric ID.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly says when to use it: after boond_notifications_search, to get attributes not in the list summary. It also names the alternative and the exclusion condition: do not use boond_notifications_search if the ID is unknown because this tool does not accept a name. This is clear routing guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools