Skip to main content
Glama
fauguste

boondmanager-mcp-server

Créer un(e) facture

boond_invoices_create

Create a new invoice in BoondManager. Specify reference, order ID, dates, amount, tax rate, and optionally add line items and payments.

Instructions

Crée un(e) nouvel(le) facture dans BoondManager.

Returns: Données du/de la facture créé(e) avec son ID.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
noteNoNotes / commentaires
stateNoÉtat de la facture
orderIdNoID du bon de commande associé
taxRateNoTaux de TVA (%)
referenceNoRéférence de la facture
invoiceDateNoDate de facturation (YYYY-MM-DD)
invoiceRecordsNoLignes de facture Boond
invoicePaymentsNoPaiements client de la facture
amountExcludingTaxNoMontant HT
expectedPaymentDateNoDate d'échéance/paiement attendu (YYYY-MM-DD)

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idNoIdentifiant de l'entité créée/modifiée
typeNo
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description only mentions creation and return of the invoice with ID. It lacks details on side effects, authorization needs, or error scenarios. Annotations provide no help (all false).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is minimal with two sentences, no wasted words, and front-loads the primary action.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 10 optional parameters and an implied output schema, the description is too brief to guide effective use. It omits examples, parameter relationships, or typical usage patterns.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema covers 100% of parameters with descriptions, but the tool description does not add extra meaning beyond what the schema already provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Crée' and resource 'facture dans BoondManager', differentiating it from sibling tools like boond_invoices_get or boond_invoices_update.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as boond_provider_invoices_create, or prerequisites like requiring an orderId.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/fauguste/boondmanager-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server